[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "svn log" options and semantics

From: Francois Beausoleil <fbos_at_users.sourceforge.net>
Date: 2003-10-23 17:01:00 CEST

On 23 Oct 2003 09:58:05 -0500, "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@collab.net>
> Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:
> > "svn log" crosses copy history by default; "--strict" disables this.
> > "--strict" is far too vague a name, in the same way that "--force" is.
> Agreed. It should be '--no-copies' or something like that.
> > How about "--ignore-ancestry"? That's based on my assumption that
> > "--notice-ancestry" means to cross copy history, but I'm not sure if
> > that is so. The only description I can find says "Pay attention to
> > ancestry when calculating differences."
> No, this has nothing to do with copies. Those are talking about
> ancestry between targets of a diff or merge.

What about --ignore-copies or --ignore-copy ?

Bye !
Developer of Java Gui Builder

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 23 17:04:48 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.