Re: Link latency and ra_svn/ra_dav performance

I forgot one interesting data point...

Tobias Ringström wrote:
> I made another test (as suggested by Greg on IRC) by checking out
> subversion instead of my own little tree. Checking out a freshly import
> subversion from the 0.31.0 tarball over a 2000 kilobit 16 ms (i.e. quite
> *low* latency) link:
>
> svn before patch : 2m18.837s [latency limited]
> svn after patch : 0m54.240s [bandwidth limited]
> cvs over ssh : 0m32.551s [bandwidth limited]

    svn over ssh after patch : 0m38.327s [bandwidth limited]

ssh is configured to use compression in both cases. As you can see, we
are not far behind CVS now...

/Tobias

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 23 02:53:09 2003