Re: Link latency and ra_svn/ra_dav performance

mark benedetto king wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 05:41:04PM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
>
>>The big question is, "how?" I think it would be especially hard with
>>ra_dav, but just thinking about ra_svn, here are the options I see:
>
> Without client-side threading (eek!) or, AFAICT, a significant neon API
> change, it would be very hard indeed for ra_dav.

I have not looked deeply into it, but we might be able to ditch
ne_request_dispatch in favor of ne_begin_request et al to issue
overlapping requests. The goal is to begin a few requests even if we
only read one result at a time. Two outstanding requests would probably
be enough for most links.

/Tobias

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 23 01:25:59 2003