On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:09:34AM +0200, Robert Simmons wrote:
> > That's just great, but it doesn't change the fact that RIGHT NOW
> > Subversion does this stuff at a higher level than the repository. You
> > asked, I answered.
>
> I am AWARE where it does this right now. I am simply saying I disagree with it
> and on a practical level in a corporate environment it would be a little crazy.
> Id have a real hard time convincing my bosses to trust apache for source
> management security. Is it because my boss is wrong? Perhaps. However he is the
> boss. If I, instead, told him we could put it on the repository as well or link
> it up with LDAP, he would sign easily.
There is a planned feature to add file-level access control. If this
is necessary for your current decision, perhaps it is best to look to
another system until things change.
> > Whoa there tiger, I think you've missed something about how to actually
> > get people to listen to you on an open source project mailing list.
> > Jumping in and pointing out how wrong everyone is without listening to
> > their reasons isn't likely to win you many friends.
>
> I am listening just fine. In fact I reply to you point by point. However a
> discussion doesnt simply end because of your reasons. There is point and counter
> point and so on. I am still waiting to hear counter points that say projects are
> bad ideas. I have heard alot of you not personally thinking they are necessary
> and you not personally missing them, but I havent heard any bad points about
> having them.
I've heard your idea about projects, but I don't understand the
feature you are asking to see. Is this *really* about a version
number?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 22 01:20:49 2003