[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn_fs_merge not used?

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2003-10-18 00:23:38 CEST

kfogel@collab.net wrote:

>Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
>
>>>If you're aiming to lose unused code, then it and svn_fs_rename() can
>>>go away.
>>>
>>>
>>Shouldn't svn_fs_rename just DTRT, and shouldn't we be using it at least
>>in URL->URL renames?
>>
>>
>
>Yes, but what is TRT? I would think this involves a new kind of
>record in the copies table, at least...
>
>?
>
>
Don't we already have that? I distinctly remember we had a real rename
operation in the FS at one point. Um. It's possible that we threw it
out, though.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Oct 18 00:26:29 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.