Re: NULL pointers.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 06:11:08PM -0700, Jack Repenning wrote:
> >Sooooo, a simple way of being sure that your memory is initialized
> >properly, even on systems where a null pointer constant is not
> >all-zero-bits, is this:
> >
> > struct some_complex_struct *foo
> >
> > {
> > struct some_complex_struct __tmp = { 0 };
>
> Doesn't this fail for the case where the _first_ field of
> some_complex_struct is a pointer, and the local architecture does
> something inane with NULL?

Is there an architecture that doesn't use ((void*) 0) for NULL?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 14 03:54:49 2003