[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "svn blame" with a specified revision

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-10-14 01:40:28 CEST

Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> writes:

> --On Monday, October 13, 2003 6:24 PM -0500 "C. Michael Pilato"
> <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:
> > Disagree. This, like other 'svn' commands, should be shorthand for
> > either 'svn blame -rWORKING FILE' (BASE + local mods) or 'svn blame
> > -rBASE FILE'. I can't decide which, but I'm leaning toward WORKING.
> Who is the author for any locally modified changes?

Yeah, phooey. They ain't the author until the commit happens, right?
And besides, we can't guarantee a username.

> I think -rBASE makes a *little* more sense. -- justin


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 14 01:41:36 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.