Re: "svn blame" with a specified revision

Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> writes:

> --On Monday, October 13, 2003 6:24 PM -0500 "C. Michael Pilato"
> <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:
>
> > Disagree. This, like other 'svn' commands, should be shorthand for
> > either 'svn blame -rWORKING FILE' (BASE + local mods) or 'svn blame
> > -rBASE FILE'. I can't decide which, but I'm leaning toward WORKING.
>
> Who is the author for any locally modified changes?

Yeah, phooey. They ain't the author until the commit happens, right?
And besides, we can't guarantee a username.

> I think -rBASE makes a *little* more sense. -- justin

Agreed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 14 01:41:36 2003