[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "svn blame" with a specified revision

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-10-14 01:24:57 CEST

Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:

> "svn blame FILE"
> - Shorthand for "svn blame -rHEAD FILE".

Disagree. This, like other 'svn' commands, should be shorthand for
either 'svn blame -rWORKING FILE' (BASE + local mods) or 'svn blame
-rBASE FILE'. I can't decide which, but I'm leaning toward WORKING.

The problem you constantly run into when presuming that omitting a
revision specifier means "equate this with HEAD" is when the item no
longer exists in HEAD. The default behavior should be one which
is guaranteed to work, methinks.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 14 01:26:07 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.