[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Doubt about auto properties

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: 2003-10-10 01:31:17 CEST

Philip Martin wrote:
> Martin Furter <mf@rola.ch> writes:
>>On 9 Oct 2003, Lele Gaifax wrote:
>>>*.rst = svn:eol-style=native
>>>*.rst = svn:keywords=LastChangedDate LastChangedRevision LastChangedDate LastChangedBy HeadURL
>>>Am I missing the point, or is that comment misleading?

The point of the comment was to mean that you are allowed to have DIFFERENT file-name-patterns that match the same file: e.g. "*.rst" and "temp.*" both match "temp.rst".

>>The config is stored in apr hashes so i assume that the value of the
>>former one was replaced by that of the latter one when reading the config.
> We could check when adding to the hash that the key does not already
> exist. It could even be a hard error, just like a config parse error.

Yes, I'd say that should be considered a parse error regardless of whether any additional clarification is needed in the autoprops documentation. Are you volunteering?

- Julian

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 10 01:30:28 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.