[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: rev 7365 - in trunk/subversion: include libsvn_subr libsvn_wc

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-10-09 19:09:09 CEST

Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:
> Interface rules over implementation. Implementation can create a
> const local variable that is a copy of the argument, if it really
> wants to, though I don't like marking any local variable "const" at
> all. If a local variable is in use for such a large extent of code
> that it is in danger of being accidentally modified, then the code
> is too long.
> I'm off cycling now; will argue^H^H^H^H^Hdebate more fully later if required.

I'm not advocating that the change be reverted. I was just trying to
answer the question "Why would anyone want to const these?". I think
it's a fine change. I should never have followed up; I hereby leave
this thread :-).

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 9 19:44:23 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.