[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Should SVN allocate ports for ra_dav (plain and ssl) from IANA?

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-10-07 23:50:32 CEST

Jani Averbach <jaa@cc.jyu.fi> writes:

> I have been wondering if subversion project should allocate official
> ports for ra_dav (plain and ssl) from IANA.

I don't see any reason to.

> Those port should be used when apache has been compiled just for
> back-end for subversion, and there is a real www-server for ordinary
> www-stuff. In this case, I feel the apache+subversion combo more a
> subversion server than www-server.

So what? We're still speaking HTTP. HTTP is traditionally port
80. If someone is using HTTP just to grab tarballs, is apache just a
"file server", rather than a www-server? If someone is using HTTP to
run CGI-database queries, is apache a "database server", rather than a
www-server?

So if someone is using HTTP to version code, I don't think of apache
as any less 'webby'. It's an HTTP server, not a 'web' server.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 7 23:52:57 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.