Re: undo records

"Glenn A. Thompson" <gthompson@cdr.net> writes:

> Hey,
> My GAT buzzer went off:-)
>
> >
> >p.s. GAT: even though these may be "neat", they aren't used, so should be
> >removed; there shouldn't be "features" without a specific need.
> >
> As long as you don't have a problem with it being put back at a later
> date (if needed), I won't complain.
> In fact: Great! This means we can delete svn_fs_deltify,
> svn_fs_undeltify, and set_berkeley_errcall. Yay!

Haven't looked at set_berkeley_errcall(), but the deltify functions
are definitely going away. Can you say "implementation detail"?!?!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 24 20:57:15 2003