Whups - he's right. This would also circumvent the chicken-and-egg
situation. I hadn't read down that far in the Makefile.
Sorry.
Shamim Islam
BA BS
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 13:28, David Summers wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Chris Croome wrote:
>
> > I thought I'd upgrade to the latest subversion this afternoon but I
> > ran into the following problem:
> >
> > - The latest subversion needs the latest neon to compile:
> >
> > neon-devel >= 0.24.2 is needed by subversion-0.29.0-7111
> >
> > - However this can't be installed without uninstalling subversion:
> >
> > [root@atomism i386]# rpm -Uvh neon-*.rpm
> > error: Failed dependencies:
> > libneon.so.23 is needed by (installed) subversion-0.29.0-6982
> >
> > - And if I uninstall neon and subversion and then install the latest
> > neon and try to compile subversion it fails because it requires
> > subversion to be installed...
> >
>
> What is the error message? Is it something to do with the "svn status"
> command? Did you read the README file?
>
> If it is what I think it is then you can say "make RELEASE=YYYY" where
> YYYY is your favorite release number and it will build the RPM with that
> designator and override the "svn status" command.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Sep 21 19:45:59 2003