Sorry - guess it would only be useful if you spent hours staring at a
mess on the screen as it compiled. I just know that once I saw how the
new kernel-2.26-test4 and test5 compiled w/o all that noise, that it
made a lot of sense.
You can lose the warning messages with too much background noise (text).
And since you can turn all the messages back on, you can dig into the
errors as you need to.
Dunno. May just be aesthetics. But when I've been compiling for 6-8h
strahgt, I'd like to be able to see what's happening from a higher level
view.
Shamim Islam
BA BS
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 17:04, Julian Foad wrote:
> Files wrote:
> > Compare that output to a regular bootstrap compile of subversion - granted, I only
> > have it working that way in the rpms...... all done through some superficial
> > patches.......... :-D
>
> Perhaps it is very nice, but I don't have time to investigate unless you say something that makes me think it is interesting to me.
>
> - Julian
>
>
> > kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> >
> >>"Files" <files@poetryunlimited.com> writes:
> >>
> >>>I don't know if anyone else can appreciate this, but I'll post it
> >>>anyway. Maybe someone can.
> >>
> >>Uh, it would be a lot more comprehensible with some sort of
> >>explanatory preface...
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Sep 20 05:08:54 2003