Re: The fate of cmpilato and Subversion

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 06:28:56AM +0000, Han The Man wrote:
>
> Jokes aside, does the project feel that the knowledge of participating
> people is documented well enough? If history applies, my guess would
> be "no".

It's probably more a question of general familiarity with the code in
question.

> As a general question - what kind of tools or methodologies could or
> should open source projects apply to rectify the situation?

A text editor and writting. Simply put, documentation. In general,
each and every function should have clearly understandable purpose and
description statement.

-- 
Jamin W. Collins
This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string together lots
of very specific tools to accomplish larger tasks. -- Vineet Kumar
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org