Marc Singer <elf@buici.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 12:12:15PM -0500, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > Marc Singer <elf@buici.com> writes:
> > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:57:03PM -0500, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > > > Actually, I believe that it has, and it was rejected because there is n
> o
> > > > logical mapping between UNIX fs permissions and Windows fs ACLs. I
> > > > recall the consensus being that it wasn't worth it to stuff in a whole
> > > > bunch of platform specific hoo-ha to accomodate this buglet.
> > >
> > > That isn't the kind of permissions check I'm talking about.
> > >
> > > The BDB backend is a process running within the context of a user, no
> > > what operating system this happens to execute on. If the privilege of
> > > that user is insufficient to write to the database, any operations on
> > > the repository will fail. We can check for this kind of failure.
> > > Moreover, we can check for a privilege failure where the user can
> > > access some files/directories but not all of them. Should the user be
> > > running on Windows and this check is difficult to make, then oh well,
> > > we don't do it. In this case, there no priviledge 'mapping' to be
> > > done.
> >
> > Aha. Well, that sounds OK to me. Consider this a +.5, and a +1 if you
> > want to write the patch. :-)
>
> What's that? +1 what?
Subversion uses Apache style voting:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/guidelines.html
> I'll look at writing a patch.
Groovy.
-Fitz
--
Brian W. Fitzpatrick <fitz_at_red-bean.com> http://www.red-bean.com/fitz/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 5 21:02:17 2003