Re: Pressing need for exclusive locking

At 7:13 PM +0000 9/3/03, Ronald Cannes wrote:
>
>>and includes some rather ... oh, let's call it "hand-holding" ...
>>attitude toward developers that doesn't sit well with me.
>
>All this model means is that people can lock files, but if they
>don't hold their part of the lease, well..., then the lock
>disappears. No need to force unlocks, people can see who locked a
>resource and when it will be available.

I was referring to your idea of refusing the commit if the lease had
been allowed to expire, not to mention your editorial gloss on it as
a behavior modification measure.

-- 
-==-
Jack Repenning
CollabNet, Inc.
8000 Marina Boulevard, Suite 600
Brisbane, California 94005
o: 650.228.2562
c: 408.835-8090
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org