Re: .svn directories

At 2:44 PM -0700 8/25/03, Kumaran Santhanam wrote:
>
>I guess the best thing to do
>is to get the patch out there and see what reports people come
>back with.

Mmmm .... a patch that exists only as a patch, for people to try out
at will, perhaps. A patch that exists as a branch, likewise (and
probably a better approach, in order to track the trunk). But not in
trunk/. We're really trying to get trunk/ releasable, and neither
the idea of a minimally verified patch (even if it is optional), nor
a minimally verified germ-of-an-idea fits that goal at all.

I'm not at all jazzed, either, about the idea that there would
permanently be a choice of working-copy types. Life's confusing
enough already.

-- 
-==-
Jack Repenning
CollabNet, Inc.
8000 Marina Boulevard, Suite 600
Brisbane, California 94005
o: 650.228.2562
c: 408.835-8090
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org