Re: svn rm empty-dir fails
From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2003-08-23 03:45:56 CEST
Rene Rebe <rene.rebe@gmx.net> writes:
> Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> wrote:
That question was answered below.
> It was HEAD before - and should so after the commit, shouldn't it?
In general the working copy is not HEAD, it certainly wasn't in your
[...]
>> - One may commit an add in an out-of-date directory provided the item
The general principle we used was that 'svn commit' should not delete
>> - Neither of the above cause the working copy directory to get
That is the answer to your first question.
>> - One cannot commit a delete of an out-of-date directory. To do so
The general principle about deleting information applies.
> And can't the same "no conflict rule" as for adds seems to apply be
The rule for adds is simple, one cannot add an item "foo" if an item
-- Philip Martin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sat Aug 23 03:46:50 2003 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.