Re: cvs2svn crash

kfogel@collab.net writes:

> The theory is that since there are more than one that *would* work, we
> should rule out the ones that we know don't work. Maybe we should do
> it the other way -- if we have a list of all the ones that are known
> to work, though.

Since we now know that hashdb works, and that dumbdb and dbm does not,
all that remains is to check if gdbm works or not. I don't have it
though, so I can't test. If it does work, then it makes sense to keep
using anydbm, but check that the DBM is either hashdb or gdbm.

As I can now append new info to issues, I'm reverting this thread
back to the issue tracker... :-)

  // Marcus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 22 18:24:52 2003