[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: request for comments from developers about issues 1004 and 901

From: SteveKing <steveking_at_gmx.ch>
Date: 2003-08-12 21:27:08 CEST

----- Original Message -----
From: "D.J. Heap" <djheap@dhiprovo.com>
>
> A while ago I actually went through and changed the notification
> mechanism to use a struct (the mails are on the list somewhere with
> discussion from Philip) -- it really isn't very hard and is not called
> from that many places (a dozenish, IIRC). Adding the 'union of structs'
> concept would be more work, but not that much. I still plan on doing
> that when I get some free time, but I'm not sure when that will be, and
> it wasn't pressing since it wasn't really a problem -- just an api
> convenience at the time.

I still don't know how such a union of structs should look like.
Right now the callback function takes 8 parameters. Would that
be changed to one parameter being the union?
And then that union would contain all those parameters and some
more for the progress information in the struct?

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 22 04:03:11 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.