Re: [PATCH] Issue #1074: Need a svnadmin command to verify that the repository is not corrupted (Take 2)

On Thursday 14 August 2003 20:15, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> John Szakmeister <john@szakmeister.net> writes:
> > > John: go for it, and if that means starting 4 days from now ... well,
> > > I know *I* have plenty of other fish to fry in the meantime. :-)
> >
> > So should I implement both the option and the subcommand, or just the
> > subcommand then? I'm personally leaning towards just the
> > subcommand.
>
> Just the subcommand. Thanks, dude.

Done. However, I only have a small test set so I'm not sure if my results are
reliable in any way. Right now I'm seeing only a small difference (<1
second) in the time it takes to verify the repository and to dump it to
/dev/null. Does someone have a repo that I can play with that contains more
revisions and paths? I'd really like to see if there is really going to be a
difference in performance or not.

Any suggestions for testing?

-John

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 19 12:01:33 2003