Re: Subversion performance (issue #1429 et al)

Sander Striker wrote:

>More analysis:
>
>More info derived from Brandon Ehles profiling data.
>
>Library | Cycles (%) | L1 Read*(%) | L2 Read*(%)
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>libdb-4.0.so | 25.88 | 28.49 | 17.54
>libapr-0.so.0.9.4 | 19.61 | 11.07 | 24.93
>libsvn_fs-1.so.0.0.0 | 13.89 | 02.44 | 01.66
>libc-2.3.2.so | 10.78 | 09.44 | 14.95
>libsvn_delta-1.so.0.0.0 | 10.50 | 39.12 | 17.76
>libaprutil-0.so.0.9.4 | 08.61 | 01.65 | 01.70
>libsvn_subr-1.so.0.0.0 | 06.03 | 04.59 | 14.11
>libexpat.so.0.4.0 | 01.57 | - | 01.44
>ISO8859-1.so | 01.40 | - | -
>libsvn_wc-1.so.0.0.0 | 01.16 | 01.80 | 04.49
>
>*) read cache misses
>
>Well, that's a surprise. I expected to see libsvn_wc a lot higher up.
>
Do these data take into account the time spent blocking on I/O
operations? I suspect not, or libsvn_wc should definitely be higher up.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org