Re: [PATCH] dynamically link swig runtime on windows (Can I commit this?)

Branko Čibej wrote:
> Russell Yanofsky wrote:
>
>>> I think it's much cleaner to do so before.
>>>
>>>
>> In what sense?
>>
>>
> For one thing, Python wouldn't be required to build from the tarball.
> Of course, that's assuming our source tarballs are ever useful for
> Windows builds...

You can get the exact same effect by making swigpy.c and its counterparts
before you tar up the source. I don't know if this would make a whole lot
of sense though, since you'd be including swig runtime code in the tarball
but still requiring the user to install his own (possibly different) version
of swig.

- Russ

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Aug 16 21:09:56 2003