RE: svn_pool_xxx vs apr_pool_xxx

On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 14:02, Sander Striker wrote:
> Why yes indeed it does. Another reason to kill it. What an application
> decides to do when it runs out of memory*, is a decision to make for
> the app implementor, not for us libsvn_subr authors...

If we actually want to support anything sane happening on out-of-memory
errors, I think we have to check every call to apr_palloc(). In the
meantime, having the abort handler there is safer than just letting the
code get NULL pointers back and continue anyway.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 15 20:25:31 2003