Re: request for comments from developers about issues 1004 and 901

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:

> I'm a little down on the union of structures idea. What value is there
> in forcing all callbacks into the same calling convention? Is a giant
> switch statement better than multiple different functions?

I'm concerned, too, but mainly because I have serious doubts about how
swig will deal with such a thing, and how code written to the bindings
will deal with swig's dealings. Or something.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 12 23:08:30 2003