[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: request for comments from developers about issues 1004 and 901

From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-08-12 23:05:30 CEST

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:

> I'm a little down on the union of structures idea. What value is there
> in forcing all callbacks into the same calling convention? Is a giant
> switch statement better than multiple different functions?

I'm concerned, too, but mainly because I have serious doubts about how
swig will deal with such a thing, and how code written to the bindings
will deal with swig's dealings. Or something.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 12 23:08:30 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.