[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: request for comments from developers about issues 1004 and 901

From: SteveKing <steveking_at_gmx.ch>
Date: 2003-08-12 19:37:23 CEST

----- Original Message -----
From: <kfogel@collab.net>

> "SteveKing" <steveking@gmx.ch> writes:
> > But I know that patches which change a lot
> > of code are as good as no patch at all right now (they won't
> > get applied). AFAIK the policy is to _not_ include such
> > patches before 1.0 so that possible new bugs can't get in.
>
> The decision process is not nearly as algorithmic as you suggest.
> It's a fuzzy mix of issue severity, effort required, likely risk to
> create new bugs, impact on design, and amount of sugar in the
> bloodstream of the reviewer.

So to increase the amount of sugar in the bloodstream I should
send some candies, cookies and cakes? :)
(I promise I would buy those and not make them myself :)

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 12 19:38:21 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.