"Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey@optimaltec.com> writes:
> Technically, I don't think it's "impossible" :-), but the general
> opinion seems to be that it's "unnecessary". MBK identified two short
> pieces of code that don't work with Neon 0.24, they're simply omitted
> for 0.24 right now. Will I make them work? Probably not before David
> can start (and a long time after that, I never programmed for SSL/TLS
> before), but I'll look into this for fun and experience :-). Also, I
> can try and make current Subversion work with Neon 0.24 SSL abtraction
> API, but I certainly will not be able to add features that David wants
> to add, in a relatively short timeframe.
I don't want us to claim support for neon 0.24 if we have to add an
disclaimer that "Oh, but something that currently works if you are
using 0.23.9 won't work if you upgrade." David's new functionality
can come in any time he sees fit to add it. But I think we should at
least avoid *losing* functionality for people who upgrade to Neon
0.24.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 12 17:46:07 2003