Jack Repenning <jrepenning@collab.net> writes:
> >Jack Repenning <jrepenning@collab.net> writes:
> >> All that granted, I think Greg's insistence that no notation but the
> >> defined one "hit the wire" for DAV is proper, and inescapably leads to
> >> the rest of what I said here. This scheme is the only viable
> > > candidate. whatever its demerits.
> >
> >Why does the thing that goes over the wire in DAV have to look the
> >same as the thing the user types?
>
> In the case where the user is typing into a web browser (the problem
> that got us started on this discussion, this time around anyway), no
> Subversion code is involved until you cross the wire to the server
> side. Is it?
Yup. So if the server understands the public (i.e., user-visible) URL
syntax, then it will retrieve the correct resource.
The server is also welcome to understand other syntaxes, such as
".../!svn/rev/X/...". And clients are free to transform one syntax
into another, as long as they mean the same thing and the server
understands both.
(Not proposing that we spending time making the server understand a
new syntax, by the way; but we can set a standard that depends on that
being done later.)
-K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Aug 10 06:58:16 2003