Re: Summary: URL rev proposals

Hi

Carey Evans wrote:
> Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>
>>THE SOLUTIONS:
>>
>> 1. Do nothing for now. Has some popularity at the moment.
>
>
> 1a. Do nothing for now, and let the KDE kioslave implement its own
> opaque URI scheme like x-subversion:<rev>:<real-URI>. If this works
> well then something standard can be considered for post-1.0.

I second this (because I made the same suggestion in another post ;-)

The <real-URI> could be:

http://x.y.com/some/path/some/file for using HTTP/WebDAV
svn://x.y.com/some/path/some/file for using the svn protocol
file:///some/path/some/file for using direct file access

And if there ever where another RA protocol we can add this, too.

Olli

--
og
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org