Re: Neon 0.24 testing

"Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey@optimaltec.com> wrote to Mike Pilato:
> Sure, thank you :-)! That's precisely the reason: NE_XML_INVALID
> became NE_XML_ABORT in Neon 0.24 without changing the value (-1), and
> return value contract has changed for startelm callback
> (NE_XML_DECLINE is now 0 instead of -2). And there's no validate
> callback anymore, but that's another story...

Sergey, just to make sure we're working toward the same goal here: Ben
Collins-Sussman created this branch for you

   http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/neon-0.24/

I think the idea is that first we -- uh, you -- get Neon 0.24 working
on the branch, then David Waite and you together get cert support
working on the branch (since by itself, the upgrade to Neon 0.24 is
expected to break certificates in Subversion).

Then we fold the branch back into trunk.

I'm aware that neither you nor David Waite have promised that all this
will happen :-), so this mail is really a question: does this plan
sound good to you guys?

If it does, mail me your tigris username and a password of your choice
(plain text or crypted is fine), and I'll set you up with commit
access on that branch.

Thanks,
-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 5 18:52:58 2003