Re: "svn resolve" becomes "svn resolved"

cmpilato@collab.net writes:

> Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:
>
> > Lots of people agreed that "svn resolve" should change to "svn
> > resolved" to better reflect its meaning and reduce confusion (thread
> > "'svn revert' vs. 'svn resolve'"). Some people proposed additional
> > changes, which I am not discussing here.
> >
> > Does anyone strongly object to the change?
>
> No objections here. In fact, every time I use the command I'm
> suprised that we haven't made this change yet.

+1 .... do it, man, do it!

And don't forget to do an s/resolve/resolved on the documentation as
well (book, 'svn help', man pages).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 28 18:02:51 2003