What do you mean by managed? Just recompiling it with VC as a managed
C/C++ project (mixed mode, really) works fine with a little tweaking,
but you still have to implement a totally wrapper class to make it
usable from C# and I believe there are already of couple of these
implementations around (Ankh has one, I think). IMO, there's zero
benefit to making the whole thing managed, rather than implementing a
little mixed-mode wrapper DLL around the native client libraries.
Subversion is very well designed and makes it easy.
DJ
Steele Price wrote:
> I for one would LOVE to have this ported over to MANAGED code in VS.NET.
> I am willing to help out on this.
>
> I would also like to make a go at getting this to work on IIS as an option
> to apache as well.
>
> I think that anyone actually using SVN on a windows server platform would be
> much better off with these and would give some observers and MS bigots even
> MORE incentive to take a look at using SVN over their much beleaguered VSS
> toolset!
>
> If we can interface with SVN via C# and VB by using the vs.net build that
> will also improve the outlook for SVNs use on windows. With the advent of
> Win2K3 Web Edition it would make for an excellent inexpensive box for a code
> repository, albeit not free as is my debian box running my current
> repository.
>
> Steele
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Branko Čibej" <brane@xbc.nu>
> To: "D.J. Heap" <dj@shadyvale.net>
> Cc: "François Beausoleil" <fbos@users.sourceforge.net>;
> <dev@subversion.tigris.org>
> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 10:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Precompiled SVN 0.26.0 for Win 32 available ?
>
>
>
>>D.J. Heap wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I think Branko usually provides the binaries and Jostein then builds
>>>the setup from them -- I do recall Jostein saying he would be on
>>>vacation for a while though and asked for volunteer replacements for a
>>>while. I'm not sure if anyone did. Branko also seems to have been
>>>busy or gone for a while.
>>
>>So busy I'm almost gone, 's matter of fact... :-(
>>
>>
>>>I can pretty easily build binaries, but they would be built on
>>>VSNet2003 (meaning a different c runtime dll would be used) and I
>>>can't build the complete install package.
>>>
>>>Should I build the binaries? I think I can upload them to the file
>>>sharing area -- Add a File is an active link for me when I'm logged
>>>in, anyway.
>>
>>I'll try to get those Win32 binaries built today, but I've never built
>>the installer, either. Nor can I guarantee that Win32 even works, as I
>>haven't tested it since 0.25. :-)
>>
>>
>>--
>>Brane Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 28 16:03:54 2003