Re: [PATCH] 'svn st -v' looks weird on an empty repository (Issue:708) (resend)

Benjamin Pflugmann <benjamin-svn-dev@pflugmann.de> writes:

> On Sat 2003-07-26 at 21:32:50 -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote:
>>
>> Umh, doesn't this make 'svn status -v' contact the repository in cases
>> where it previously would not?
>
> I think not. From looking at the patch (mind you, I don't know much
> about svn internals, so I could be dead wrong ;), it just determines
> how many entries (dirs/files) the local .svn-dir knows about.

I think Garrett is right, calling svn_client_ls is going to access the
repository which is not something 'svn status -v' is supposed to do.

I don't really understand the problem in issue 708, it claims the
output looks "weird", but doesn't explain why or what should change.

$ svn st -v
                0 ? ? .
$ svn st -vu
                0 ? ? .
Head revision: 0

The current behaviour looks reasonable to me.

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org