Re: [PATCH] bash_completion: improvement, fixes and tests [was: Re: subversion and programmable completion]
From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: 2003-07-26 14:30:19 CEST
Philip Martin wrote:
That's a reasonable argument. I hadn't thought of it that way around because I don't use "--help" followed by a subcommand. I think of the valid syntaxes for help as being:
svn --help|-h|-?
But "svn" accepts more than those.
I'm happy now that I understand your reasoning.
> --help option to be suggested as a completion for "svn". What do we
<pedantic>
Two more-significant issues:
1. An enhancement. On completing "st", it is annoying to stop at "st", "stat" and "status"; I think it should expand to "status" immediately. This applies to most subcommands, but there are one or two exceptions: "co" should not expand immediately to "commit" as it means something else.
2. It is difficult and unhelpful to make the completion match exactly the syntax that "svn" accepts because the syntax of "svn" itself is still, in my opinion, broken (including being too loose and not clearly defined). Can we work on that instead?
- Julian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.