[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Issue 787

From: Andrew Premdas <Andrew.I.Premdas_at_man.ac.uk>
Date: 2003-07-18 11:34:04 CEST

Thanks for that, if someone does get a build together I'd be more than happy
to try it out on my box, if that will help.

All best

Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net [mailto:kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net]On
Behalf Of kfogel@collab.net
Sent: 17 July 2003 18:23
To: Andrew Premdas
Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: Issue 787

"Andrew Premdas" <Andrew.I.Premdas@man.ac.uk> writes:
> Thanks for info Karl and clarification much appreciated. I do understand
the
> point about the issue being resolved before the beta. What I was wondering
> was since there is a two line patch that addresses this issue couldn't
this
> issue be resolved before 0.27 or 0.28.

The patch may be two lines, but testing that it will actually work
everywhere is another matter. If some committer with Windows
expertise and the right testing environment gets time to look at it,
then it will happen sooner.

You can't judge the complexity of a patch by counting its lines :-).

> Anyhow good luck moving on to betadom, and thanks for such a great
> application

Thanks!

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 18 16:17:41 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.