RE: libsvn_fs rewrite

> From: D.J. Heap [mailto:dj@shadyvale.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 4:52 AM

> What all is being addressed in the libsvn_fs rewrite that cmpilato (I
> think?) is working on?

C Mike is, yes.
 
> Some of the issues that look like they could be included in the
> libsvn_fs rewrite, if I understand things correctly, are:
>
> Reduce transaction use in BDB.

Not in the branch.

> Atomic renames.

CMike? Did it go in or not?

> Some work to help increase changeset support.

??

> Some work to help support different SQL backends.

This is something Glenn Thompson is working on.

> Others?
>
> It seems unbelievable (although it would be wonderful) that all of these
> are being addressed by the rewrite...it *is* a rewrite of libsvn_fs,
> isn't it?

No. It's straightening out some issues. Not a full rewrite. We couldn't
do that to the poor guy. Nor to ourselves, since that would put us
back quite a bit, since no doubt new bugs would be introduced etc, etc.

Sander

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jul 16 13:50:06 2003