Re: Comment on patch management RE: [PATCH]std=c89 not supported

In a message dated: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 21:15:02 CDT
"B. W. Fitzpatrick" said:

>leif.eriksen@hpa.com.au writes:
>> I've had no feed back on this yet, so I dont know.

Okay, so I'll submit this as an issue.
 
>> But on the topic of patching, the volume of patches seems to be creeping up
>> (I could be wrong, but that is my feeling), and I have noted more use of the
>> [PATCH](resend) headings, indicating more people are chasing their patches.

I've only seen one or two of these.
 
>> So perhaps we need a patch manager to help out, with acknowledging the patch
>> and chasing the committers to pass/fail the patch, and trying to stop
>> patches falling in cracks.
>
>Um. Paul Lussier *is* the patch manager--or at least the interim
>patch manager until Sander Roobol takes over again.

Well, I would say I'm a poor substitute for the real patch manager :)
I've never bungled a job so badly in my life!

But, I'm trying, and I think I'm getting the hang of it, though
slowly. I should be an expert by the time Sander Roobol gets back :)

-- 
Seeya,
Paul
--
Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC 5D21 D286 F853  E808 BB07 9239 53F1 28EE
	It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,
   but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away.
	 If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org