Re: 0.21.0 / Win98 / svn co error

Sorry for the late response, lots of things on my mind...

SteveKing wrote:

>The only disadvantage to that:
>if on systems which usually have an UID the function call
>fails the user is not informed about that.
>
>
I wonder if there's a clean way to avoid this? Perhaps changing APR to
return APR_EAGAIN instead of APR_EINVAL on systems where you're not
guaranteed to get an autheniticated user, and maybe even return a best
guess (e.g., on Win98, that could be the value of getenv("USERNAME").
Thoughts?

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org