[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] new property 'svn:tarballs'

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2003-07-13 12:23:25 CEST

"SteveKing" <steveking@gmx.ch> writes:

> From: "Ben Collins-Sussman" <sussman@collab.net>
>> Many tools have crossed this line already: for example, clearcase has
>> its own 'make' program. It scares me.
>
> Why does this scare you? I don't know clearcase at all, but
> I guess that you're not forced to use the build tool but it's
> optional?

It's optional. One of the reasons for ClearMake is that it handles the
problems conventional make has when versioned timestamps move
backwards in time.

I'm not all that keen on svn:tarballs, but I'm not all that keen on
svn:externals either. Is anyone using svn:externals? Is it much
better than doing the same thing outside the client (manually or via a
script)?

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Jul 13 12:24:20 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.