[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: smaller working-copies (was compressed or no text-base)

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-07-10 15:37:07 CEST

Michael Wood <mwood@its.uct.ac.za> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:16:04AM +0200, pmarek@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > Now I'd like to know the current status of this discussion and/or
> > possible patches. I saw that both are registered as "Post 1.0" - but
> > when is 1.0 planned, and when may this arrive??
> Issues listed as "Post 1.0" means that the core developers aren't
> planning to work on it before then, but that if someone else comes up
> with a good patch it will be considered. Of course, if the patch is
> really invasive it might not go in because of the potential for bugs.

Couldn't have said it better myself!

The "Post-1.0" designation doesn't really say that a feature will be
worked on after a certain magic date, but rather that some developers
probably are unlikely to work on it until after other ("pre-1.0")
things are finished. It's about relative priorities, not absolute

As to when 1.0 will be out, why, later this week, of course...

   <thud> :-)

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 10 16:30:04 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.