[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: State of ruby bindings?

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-07-01 18:16:02 CEST

Kristian Hogsberg <hogsberg@users.sf.net> writes:

> Yeah, I realize the SWIG bindings are easier to maintain, but I looked
> at the python bindings and I wasn't too impressed. The subversion C
> API appears to be object-oriented C, in much the same way as the Gtk+
> toolkit,

Huh? There ain't no C objects anywhere in subversion. We have no
"classes" or "inheritance" the way GTK does. We just have some tables
of functions and opaque contexts.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 1 18:17:29 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.