On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 11:00:02AM +0100, Gareth McCaughan wrote:
> On Monday 30 June 2003 10:49 am, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> [I said:]
> > > > I haven't checked whether the segfault is reproducible; so it's
> > > > conceivable that dodgy hardware could be at fault. I don't have any
> > > > strong reason to believe that my hardware *is* dodgy, though.
> >
> > Gareth, I'd be interested to hear whether this is reproducible or not.
> > It looks like the only reasons zlib should return NULL like this are
> > fairly fatal: out of memory, or library/header version mismatch.
>
> I tried the same operation again and it happened again.
> It didn't fail at the same place in the checkout, but presumably
> the repository has changed a bit in between times. Very
> similar backtrace. I'm not out of disc space, and I don't think
> I'm out of memory. In particular, a gdb process running on
> the core file is "only" about 21M in size.
>
> Anything else I should do?
Can you apply the attached neon patch and see what difference it makes?
Regards,
joe
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 1 11:53:33 2003