Re: timestamp preservation design (issue 1256)
From: John Peacock <jpeacock_at_rowman.com>
Date: 2003-06-24 22:58:29 CEST
Philip Martin wrote:
A little light just went on in my head on the subtleties with the interaction
<Anyone who has already made this conceptual leap should just hit delete>
Say I am working on a project with 1 other person on a project. I commit a
-rw-r--r-- 1 jpeacock jpeacock 6615 Jun 22 11:23 util.c
But, unbeknownst to me, my partner also changed that file around that time, so
-rw-r--r-- 1 otherusr otherusr 6625 Jun 22 11:43 util.c
Then I `svn up` and my directory looks like this
-rw-r--r-- 1 jpeacock jpeacock 6625 Jun 22 11:43 util.c
Note that the source file is newer, but not newer than the compiled version, so
Yes, the correct order should be `svn up; make` or `make realclean; make` but
I don't know the right answer; I just wanted to document that I understand the
John
-- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4501 Forbes Boulevard Suite H Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5748 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Tue Jun 24 22:59:26 2003 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.