Re: timestamp preservation design (issue 1256)
From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-06-24 18:05:43 CEST
"Ph. Marek" <philipp.marek@bmlv.gv.at> writes:
> But the use-case where non-source files are versioned (1), and these
Philipp, you're terrifying me. :-) Your proposal, so far, is to add
1. so far, your patches have tried to create a new 'svn:' property
2. You want a new property for binary-files that determines whether
3. Your solution requires property inheritance, which is another
At the moment, I still feel like the best solution is to mimic the CVS
* it keeps developers and release-managers happy 90% of the time, and
* no surprises for former CVS users.
* it only requires extremely trivial code changes; no new
In other words, it's a path of very low resistance, but still
Phillip, can you talk about why you like/dislike the CVS behavior?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.