Hi Tim,
"Leeuw van der, Tim" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I very well understand the feeling of 'enough already'. My reason for
> wondering was mainly that *if* a 0.24.3 release would come soon, then it
> would be worth holding of a release of TortoiseSVN for it.
> If no 0.24.3 release is coming, they can go ahead and release now with
> 0.24.2.
>
> (I don't know if the teams making SVN-UP javabindings, Subclipse, etc are
> planning new releases soon, but for them the same would be true.)
For svnup and subclipse (which uses the same binding), I can confirm that.
Patrick
>
>
> With regards,
>
> --Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sander Striker [mailto:striker@apache.org]
> Sent: donderdag 19 juni 2003 16:05
> To: Leeuw van der, Tim; SVNDevList (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Subversion 0.24.2 released.
>
> > From: Leeuw van der, Tim [mailto:tim.leeuwvander@nl.unisys.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:44 PM
>
> > Since 2 more memleaks were found and fixed since this release was tagged
> > (svn switch and svn commit), would it be desirable to make a 0.24.3
> release?
> >
> > Or is the general opinion that these 2 bugs are not severe enough to
> warrant
> > yet another release?
>
> -1. Enough already.
>
> Micheal has been very nice in rolling patch release after patch release.
> I don't feel we should be pushing for another one in so little time after
> the last one. If you want to keep up, run HEAD. Otherwise, wait for the
> next release.
>
> My $0.02,
>
> Sander
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jun 20 07:46:31 2003