aargh, again the -R s..t. sorry.
but anyway, i think the behaviour is not correct, or very confusing:
> > # svn revert *
> > svn: Working copy not locked
> > svn: directory not locked (ts/ts1)
# svn st
? ts
A ts1
A ts1/bla
A ts1/bli
A ts1/blu
$ svn add ts
svn: warning: 'ts' is already under revision control
$ svn revert -R ts
$ svn st
? ts
A ts1
A ts1/bla
A ts1/bli
A ts1/blu
$ svn add ts
(it works again).
--- Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> wrote:
> solo turn <soloturn99@yahoo.com> writes:
>
> > # mkdir ts; touch ts/bla ts/bli ts/blu
> > # mkdir ts1; touch ts1/bla ts1/bli ts1/blu
> > # cp -r ts1 tsrt@mozart:/mnt/hdb2/home/rt/wc
> > # svn add *
> > # svn revert *
> > svn: Working copy not locked
> > svn: directory not locked (ts/ts1)
>
> You have asked for a non-recursive revert of a schedule-add directory
> with schedule-add children. What should revert do?
>
> --
> Philip Martin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 19 21:28:00 2003