Re: incremental conversion from other SCM to svn by vcp

On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 04:23:02AM +0800, Chia-liang Kao wrote:
>
> > (I'm not sure how using date instead of revision will help your CVS
> > retrieval time? I would think the Subversion commits are a huge
> > bottleneck... outputting to a dumpfile and then loading it might save
> > a lot of time.)
>
> with the date checkout heuristic, I just got it to < 4 hours today. note
> that this is a conversion from remote cvs tree, so every cvs checkout or
> update for a single file takes 2 or 3 seconds. 51% of the time is waiting
> cvs results, while 48% of the time is for svn invokation.

Excellent! Thanks (in advance) for the optimization.

One thing I'd like to do is to stage cvs reads and svn commits so they
can run in parallel. That's not high priority for me, but I can assist.

- Barrie

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jun 17 15:45:36 2003