Hey,
Greg Hudson wrote:
>On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 02:18, Glenn A. Thompson wrote:
>
>
>>Where I got confused is: I was under the impression (falsely I assume)
>>that the uuid came across
>>from the client to the server in every request.
>>
>>
>
>That can't be right. For an initial checkout, the client has no idea
>what the repository's uuid is.
>
I did say (falsely I assume) :-)
And I'm not advocating it's use. At this point, I'm just trying to
figure out what it's currently used for.
>
>
>
>>I went and looked at mod_dav_svn and I see clearly that using the
>>repository path as the key makes sense.
>>
>>
>
>Did you see my objection that multiple paths could yield the same
>repository?
>
Whoops! I found it in my trash. Sorry. I'm not sure how I did that.
Provided we use "fs_path" after the SVNParentPath logic, I don't see how
any Apache config directives could cause problems.
I do see the symlinks issue. But all that means is that we would have
two repos objects for the same repos. It's a waste but it doesn't hurt
anything. It would have to be two different paths on the same
connection to have an impact.
gat
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 11 09:22:42 2003