[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 'svn revert' vs. 'svn resolve'

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2003-06-10 18:20:25 CEST

"Max Bowsher" <maxb@ukf.net> writes:
> In any case, given the outcome of the last commit-then-discuss event
> on this subject, wouldn't it be better to wait for a firm consensus
> to form first, this time?

Uh, that's precisely what my last mail is all about.

If by "consensus" you mean everyone agrees on one action to take, then
of course no decisions will ever get made :-). But that's not what
"consensus" usually means in group decision making. Rather, it means
"no one disagrees strongly enough to claim lack of consensus"; and I'm
waiting to see if we've achieved that.

(Formally, consensus is among the committers, though in practice the
whole list is involved and we don't just toss out opinions because a
person hasn't written code!)


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jun 10 19:06:14 2003

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.